Short Answer
Overview
In the construction industry, GMP stands for Guaranteed Maximum Price. It is a project delivery method and contractual agreement where a general contractor or construction manager agrees to complete a project for a price that does not exceed a specific, predetermined limit. Unlike a traditional fixed-price contract, a GMP contract is often used in conjunction with “cost-plus” arrangements, meaning the owner pays for the actual cost of work plus a fee for the contractor’s overhead and profit.
The primary characteristic of a GMP contract is the allocation of financial risk. If the final cost of the project is lower than the GMP, the savings are often split between the owner and the contractor according to a negotiated percentage. However, if the project costs exceed the GMP, the contractor is responsible for the overages, provided the increase was not caused by owner-requested changes in scope.
History / Background
The emergence of GMP contracts grew out of a need for more flexibility and transparency in large-scale commercial and industrial projects. Traditionally, the industry relied on “Lump Sum” (Stipulated Sum) contracts, which often led to adversarial relationships when unforeseen conditions arose or when owners demanded changes after the price was set. As projects became more complex, the industry shifted toward Construction Management (CM) models.
The GMP model evolved to allow owners to begin construction before the final design was 100% complete. By utilizing a “fast-track” approach, the contractor provides a GMP based on a conceptual design or a set of preliminary documents. This allows for a more collaborative environment where the contractor’s expertise in cost-estimating is integrated into the design phase, reducing the likelihood of massive budget overruns during the actual build.
Importance and Impact
The GMP model has a significant impact on how risk is managed in the built environment. For the owner, it provides a high degree of budget certainty and protection against cost overruns, making it an attractive option for public entities or corporations with strict capital expenditure limits. It shifts the burden of efficiency onto the contractor, incentivizing them to manage subcontractors and materials effectively.
For the contractor, the GMP provides an opportunity to earn a performance bonus through “shared savings.” This aligns the goals of both parties; rather than the contractor trying to maximize change orders to increase profit, they are motivated to find the most cost-effective ways to meet the project specifications.
Why It Matters
Understanding GMP is critical for stakeholders in modern construction because it defines the legal and financial boundaries of a project. In an era of volatile material prices and labor shortages, the GMP serves as a financial hedge. It allows project owners to secure financing with a known maximum liability, while ensuring that the contractor is held accountable for the accuracy of their estimates and the efficiency of their operations.
Common Misconceptions
A GMP is the same as a Fixed-Price or Lump Sum contract.
While both set a ceiling, a Lump Sum contract is a single price for the whole scope. A GMP is typically a cost-plus arrangement with a ceiling; if the project costs less than the GMP, the owner may get money back, which does not happen in a Lump Sum contract.
The contractor pays for everything regardless of the reason once the GMP is hit.
The GMP only covers the original agreed-upon scope. If the owner requests a “Change Order” (e.g., adding a new wing to a building), the GMP is adjusted upward to account for that additional work.
FAQ
Who pays if the project goes over the GMP?
The general contractor is responsible for costs exceeding the GMP, provided the increase is not due to owner-approved changes in scope.
What happens if the project costs less than the GMP?
Depending on the contract, the savings are either returned to the owner or shared between the owner and the contractor via a 'shared savings' clause.
Is a GMP contract riskier for the contractor?
Yes, because the contractor assumes the risk of cost overruns, whereas in a cost-plus contract, the owner assumes that risk.
Leave a Reply