Short Answer
When It Makes Sense
- Good fit: You enjoy deep narrative continuity and want to experience Geralt’s evolution from the start of the series. Playing the first two titles provides context for character relationships and recurring plot threads that enrich Witcher 3.
- Good fit: You have a flexible gaming schedule and don’t mind older graphics or clunkier combat. If you can allocate 30–40 hours for each prequel without feeling rushed, the immersive world‑building payoff is worth it.
When You Should Avoid It
- Warning sign: Your primary goal is to finish Witcher 3 quickly and you have limited free time. Adding two additional games could push the total playtime beyond 80 hours, making the experience feel like a marathon rather than a focused adventure.
- Warning sign: You are sensitive to outdated UI designs, inconsistent difficulty spikes, or the lack of modern quality‑of‑life features. The first two games were released in 2007 and 2011, so they may feel frustrating compared to present‑day standards.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Enhanced story comprehension – early games introduce characters like Triss, Yennefer, and Dandelion in ways that resonate later.
- Gameplay variety – each prequel experiments with RPG mechanics (alchemy, monster contracts, dialogue choices) that broaden your skill set before the open‑world sandbox of Witcher 3.
Cons
- Time investment – roughly 30–40 hours per title, which can delay reaching the highly acclaimed Witcher 3.
- Technical limitations – older engines result in lower resolution textures, occasional bugs, and a steeper learning curve for combat compared to the refined system in Witcher 3.
Decision Checklist
- Do I have at least 70 hours of discretionary gaming time in the next few months?
- Am I interested in seeing how narrative threads from the early games resolve in Witcher 3?
- Is my hardware compatible with the PC versions of Witcher 1 and 2 (or do I have a console that supports them)?
Alternatives to Consider
If the time or technical barriers are a concern, you can start with Witcher 3 and then play the prequels later as optional side‑quests. Another option is to watch comprehensive story recap videos or read plot summaries for Witcher 1 and 2, which give most of the narrative context without the gameplay commitment. Finally, consider playing the enhanced edition of Witcher 2 (the “Enhanced Edition”) which smooths many technical rough edges while still delivering the core story.
Final Recommendation
For players who value narrative depth, have flexible schedules, and don’t mind older graphics, starting with Witcher 1 and 2 before Witcher 3 is a rewarding path. If you’re pressed for time, prefer modern gameplay, or are primarily interested in the open‑world experience, jumping straight into Witcher 3 and revisiting the prequels later is a sensible compromise. As with any major gaming decision, weigh your available time, hardware, and desire for story continuity before committing.
FAQ
Should I play Witcher 1 and 2 before 3?
It depends on your priorities. If you value story depth and have the time, playing the first two games will enrich your experience of Witcher 3. If you prefer a modern gameplay experience and have limited time, starting with Witcher 3 is perfectly acceptable.
What should I consider before I play Witcher 1 and 2 before 3?
Ask yourself how much time you can commit, whether you own compatible hardware, and how important the early story arcs are to you. Also consider if you’re comfortable with older game mechanics or would rather watch summaries and jump straight into Witcher 3.

Leave a Reply