Short Answer
Complete Explanation
In legal drafting, the term “notwithstanding” is used as a functional tool to establish a hierarchy of authority within a document. When a clause begins with “notwithstanding,” it signals that the provisions following the term will take precedence over any other conflicting rules, laws, or agreements mentioned.
- The Override Mechanism: It acts as a “trump card.” If Section A says one thing and Section B says “Notwithstanding Section A, X shall happen,” then Section B is the ruling authority in the event of a conflict.
- Notwithstanding Anything to the Contrary: This is a common broad phrase used to ensure that a specific provision prevails over every other part of the agreement or law, regardless of whether a specific conflict is named.
- Notwithstanding the Foregoing: This phrase is typically used to indicate that the current provision overrides everything previously stated in the document up to that point.
History / Background
The term originates from the Old English “not-with-standing,” literally meaning “not standing with” or “notwithstanding the fact that.” In the evolution of Common Law and statutory drafting, the need for precision in resolving contradictions led to the adoption of this term. Legal scribes and legislators required a way to create exceptions to general rules without deleting the general rule entirely. By using “notwithstanding,” they could maintain a general framework while carving out specific, prioritized exceptions that remain legally enforceable even when they appear to clash with the broader text.
Importance and Impact
The primary impact of “notwithstanding” is the prevention of legal ambiguity. Without such terminology, courts would have to rely on general canons of construction—such as the rule that a specific provision governs over a general one—to resolve conflicts. By explicitly using “notwithstanding,” the drafter removes the guesswork for judges and attorneys, clearly stating which clause “wins” in a dispute. This is critical in complex commercial contracts, insurance policies, and constitutional law, where a single word can shift the entire liability or authority of a party.
Why It Matters
For the modern reader or practitioner, understanding this term is essential for accurate document interpretation. In a contract, missing a “notwithstanding” clause could lead a party to believe they have a right or obligation that is actually overridden by another section. In constitutional contexts, such as the “Notwithstanding Clause” (Section 33) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the term allows a government to enact laws that temporarily override certain protected rights, demonstrating the immense power of the word to alter legal obligations.
Common Misconceptions
That “notwithstanding” means the other rule is completely deleted or void.
The other rule still exists; it is simply superseded in the specific instance where a conflict occurs.
That it is always used to override other laws.
While it can override laws, it is most frequently used within a single contract to override other clauses within that same contract.
FAQ
What is the simplest way to translate 'notwithstanding' in a legal sentence?
Replace it with 'despite' or 'regardless of' to understand the basic meaning.
Does 'notwithstanding' always make a clause the most important one?
Yes, within the specific context of the conflict it addresses; it signals that the provision it introduces takes priority over the mentioned conflicting parts.
What happens if two different clauses both start with 'notwithstanding'?
This creates a drafting error known as a 'conflict of laws' within the document, often requiring a court to determine intent based on the order of the clauses or other interpretative rules.
Leave a Reply