Short Answer
Complete Explanation
The LSAT frequently includes questions that ask examinees to interpret an author’s implicit assumptions. When a passage states that the author “takes for granted” something, it signals that the author treats that idea as obvious or self‑evident, without providing supporting evidence. Recognizing this helps the test‑taker identify the underlying premise that the author relies on, which is often the key to answering inference and main‑point questions correctly.
- Literal definition:
To assume something is true or inevitable without proof. - LSAT reading context:
Used to test a student’s ability to infer the author’s implied meaning and identify unstated premises. - Implication for test takers:
Identifying that the author treats a premise as given helps locate the correct answer choice that reflects the passage’s underlying logic. - Typical question type:
Inference, main point, or author’s attitude questions often hinge on recognizing a “takes for granted” assumption. - Strategic tip:
When a passage says an idea is taken for granted, look for answer choices that either challenge that assumption or rely on it as a foundation.
Common Misconceptions
“Takes for granted” means the author is being careless.
The phrase only appears in logical‑reasoning sections.
FAQ
Why does the LSAT use the phrase “takes for granted”?
The LSAT uses it to assess a test‑taker’s ability to identify implicit assumptions, a key skill for legal analysis.
How can I spot a “takes for granted” assumption in a passage?
Look for statements where the author does not provide evidence for a claim, implying it is accepted as obvious or self‑evident.
Does “takes for granted” affect answer choices in logical‑reasoning questions?
While most common in reading comprehension, the concept can appear in logical‑reasoning passages; recognizing it helps eliminate choices that contradict the unstated premise.
Leave a Reply